RESPONSE OF ASIAN COUNTRIES TO THE WIDESPREAD OF DUAL CITIZENSHIP POLICIES

Penulis

  • HILAL RAMDHANI Jurusan Ilmu Politik, FISIP, Universitas Siliwangi, Tasikmalaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v10i4.4462

Kata Kunci:

Negara, Warga Negara, Kewarganegaraan Ganda, Hukum, Politik

Abstrak

Warga negara merupakan salah satu unsur keberadaan suatu negara, sehingga warga negara merupakan faktor penting dalam keberlangsungan suatu negara. Di era modern saat ini, di mana masyarakat memiliki mobilitas tinggi untuk bepergian bahkan tinggal di luar negeri, perkawinan beda negara semakin marak, yang mendorong lahirnya anak dari orang tua yang berbeda negara. Kondisi ini menimbulkan berbagai tantangan dalam menentukan status hukum kewarganegaraan, salah satunya adalah memunculkan keputusan politik untuk mengakui kewarganegaraan ganda. Secara politis, kewarganegaraan ganda merupakan keputusan politik yang sangat dilematis bagi negara-negara Asia yang secara historis mengalami masa kolonialisme, kegiatan ekonomi yang masih bergantung pada Barat, dan nasionalisme yang kuat, sehingga membuat keputusan politik untuk menerapkan kewarganegaraan ganda menjadi beragam dan kontradiktif. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengungkap respon negara-negara di Asia terhadap maraknya keputusan politik mengenai kewarganegaraan ganda. Artikel ini menggunakan studi pustaka yang bersumber dari berbagai penelitian terkait kewarganegaraan ganda, khususnya di negara-negara Asia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa negara-negara di Asia lebih sulit menerima kewarganegaraan ganda karena aspek historis, ekonomi, dan nasionalisme, serta aspek-aspek lain yang menunjukkan perbedaan dengan negara-negara di Eropa, Amerika, dan Afrika. Negara-negara di Asia belum sepenuhnya merespon dengan baik penyebaran kewarganegaraan ganda, sehingga kewarganegaraan ganda masih menjadi isu yang diperjuangkan oleh diaspora dan menghadapi pertentangan dari masyarakat lokal.

Referensi

Adrian, F., Miriam, F., & Michael, P. S. (2017). The human face of global mobility: A research agenda. The human face of global mobility, 1-25.

Alarian, H. M., & Goodman, S. W. (2017). Dual citizenship allowance and migration flow: An origin story. Comparative Political Studies, 50(1), 133-167.

Benhabib, S. (2017). Citizens, residents, and aliens in a changing world: Political membership in the global era. In Citizenship Rights (pp. 147-182). Routledge.

Christiano, T. (2018). The rule of the many: Fundamental issues in democratic theory. Routledge.

Eudo Citizenship Observatory. (2017). Country Profiles. http://eudo-citizenship.eu/country-profiles.

Faist, T., Gerdes, J., & Rieple, B. (2004). Dual citizenship as a path-dependent process. International Migration Review, 38, 913-944.

Folger, J. (2023, April 11). Dual Citizenship Advantages and Disadvantages. https://shorturl.at/dhJM2

Fraser, N. (1996). Social Justice in The Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation: Stanford University.

Fuchs, D., & Roller, E. (2018). Conceptualizing and measuring the quality of democracy: the citizens’ perspective. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 22-32.

Harpaz, Y., & Mateos, P. (2019). Strategic citizenship: Negotiating membership in the age of dual nationality. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(6), 843-857.

Hermanto, B. (2022). Reformulasi Undang-Undang Kewarganegaraan Indonesia: Perspektif Politik Hukum, Problematik, dan Prospek Pengaturan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 19(2), 209-230.

Howard, M. M. (2005). Variation in dual citizenship policies in the countries of the EU. International Migration Review, 39, 697-720.

Isin, E. F. & Wood, P. K. (1999). Citizenship & Identity. London: Sage.

Isin, E. F., & Turner, B. S. (2007). Investigating citizenship: An agenda for citizenship studies. Citizenship studies, 11(1), 5-17.

Kim, J. (2019). ‘Ethnic capital’and ‘flexible citizenship’in unfavourable legal contexts: stepwise migration of the Korean Chinese within and beyond northeast Asia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(6), 939-957.

Kuhlthau, C. C. (2002). Teaching the Library Research Process. Scarecrow Press.

Mansoor, M. (2021). Citizens' trust in government as a function of good governance and government agency's provision of quality information on social media during COVID-19. Government information quarterly, 38(4), 101597.

Mateos, P. (2019). The mestizo nation unbound: dual citizenship of Euro-Mexicans and US-Mexicans. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45(6), 917-938.

Mau, S., Gülzau, F., Laube, L., & Zaun, N. (2015). The global mobility divide: How visa policies have evolved over time. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(8), 1192-1213.

Olssen, M., & Peters, M. A. (2005). Neoliberalism, Higher Education and The Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313-345.

Poethig, K. (2006). Sitting Between Two Chairs: Cambodia’s Dual Citizenship Debate 3 4. In Expressions of Cambodia (pp. 89-101). Routledge.

Sharma, S., & Warkentin, M. (2019). Do I really belong?: Impact of employment status on information security policy compliance. Computers & Security, 87, 101397.

Simonsen, K. B. (2017). Does citizenship always further Immigrants’ feeling of belonging to the host nation? A study of policies and public attitudes in 14 Western democracies. Comparative Migration Studies, 5, 1-17.

Simsa, R. (2017). Leaving emergency management in the refugee crisis to civil society? The case of Austria. Journal of Applied Security Research, 12(1), 78-95.

Titko, E., Kurovska, I., Korniienko, P., Balzhyk, I. A., & Stoyatska, G. M. (2021). Military-civil interaction through the prism of human rights protection: the experience of the ECtHR. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S3), 649-666.

Valadez, J. (2018). Deliberative democracy, political legitimacy, and self-determination in multi-cultural societies. Routledge.

Warren, M. E., & Mansbridge, J. (2013). Deliberative negotiation. Negotiating agreement in politics, 86.

Yuliartini, N. P. R., & Mangku, D. G. S. (2020). Legal protection for women victims of trafficking in Indonesia in an international human rights perspective. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1397-1404.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2024-11-22

Cara Mengutip

HILAL RAMDHANI. (2024). RESPONSE OF ASIAN COUNTRIES TO THE WIDESPREAD OF DUAL CITIZENSHIP POLICIES. Moderat : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 10(4), 723–728. https://doi.org/10.25157/moderat.v10i4.4462

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles